 |
|
The Bombay High Court has refused to expedite the release of Kangana Ranaut's directorial venture, 'Emergency,' by refusing to issue a mandatory certificate from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The court's decision came after a petition was filed by Zee Studios, the film's co-producer, seeking immediate approval for the film, which was slated to premiere on September 6th. The court, however, chose not to overrule the Madhya Pradesh High Court's prior ruling, which instructed the CBFC to deliberate upon representations submitted by the Jabalpur Sikh Sangat, a group that had voiced concerns about the film's portrayal of Sikhs and historical accuracy.
The filmmakers, represented by advocate Venkatesh Dhond, argued that the film's release was contingent upon securing the CBFC certificate and that a significant amount of money was invested in its production. However, the court remained firm in its decision, stating that it would not interfere with the CBFC's review process and ordered the body to resolve any objections or representations by September 18th. The court also acknowledged the substantial financial implications of film releases, emphasizing that the matter could not remain unresolved indefinitely.
The filmmakers contended that the CBFC had initially issued a 'U/A' certificate on August 8th after the submission of certain modifications. They further claimed that the CBFC had sealed the film's CD on August 29th and subsequently generated a digital certificate, directing them to collect it from the office. However, the filmmakers were denied the certificate during their visit. Advocate Abhinav Chandrachud, representing the CBFC, countered that the August 29th email was system-generated and that the film remained under review due to the authenticity check of sources provided by the filmmakers. This prompted the court to question the CBFC's rationale for reviewing the certificate after initially issuing it, particularly in light of the objections raised by the Sikh community.
The court also criticized the CBFC's request for a delay due to the upcoming Ganpati festival, emphasizing that it should not serve as a reason to stall the process. In response to the court's decision, Kangana Ranaut's team took to Twitter, accusing the censor board of illegally withholding the film's certificate. The Madhya Pradesh High Court, in its previous ruling, permitted the Jabalpur Sikh Sangat and Sri Guru Singh Sabha to submit detailed objections within three days. These organizations have alleged that certain scenes in the film violate the Sikh community's fundamental rights and have demanded an apology from Kangana Ranaut. The Shiromani Akali Dal, a prominent Sikh political party, has also issued a legal notice to the CBFC, urging it to halt the release of 'Emergency.'
The controversy surrounding 'Emergency' highlights the complexities of historical narratives in cinema and the challenges of balancing creative freedom with community sensitivities. The film, based on the life of former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, has sparked debates about the accuracy of its portrayal of historical events and its potential to offend religious groups. The court's decision to allow the CBFC to consider the objections raised by the Sikh community underscores the importance of respecting diverse perspectives and ensuring that films do not perpetuate harmful stereotypes or historical inaccuracies. The upcoming weeks will be crucial for the future of 'Emergency,' as the CBFC's decision on the film's certificate will determine its fate and impact the broader dialogue surrounding historical narratives in cinema.
Source: Court refuses to order certification of 'Emergency', Kangana Ranaut reacts