 |
|
Shashi Tharoor, known for his expansive vocabulary and insightful commentary, has publicly called for Virat Kohli to reconsider his retirement from Test cricket. This plea comes amidst India's struggles in England, particularly with their batting lineup. Tharoor believes Kohli's return would significantly bolster the team's stability and leadership, invoking memories of Kohli's past performances and inspirational presence. The article delves into the reasons behind Kohli's initial retirement, the current state of the Indian batting order, and the potential for a reconciliation between Kohli, the BCCI, and Gautam Gambhir. Tharoor's suggestion underscores the perceived void left by Kohli's absence, both in terms of batting prowess and the intangible qualities he brought to the team as a leader. The core argument revolves around the notion that India's current batting woes could be alleviated by Kohli's experience, particularly in challenging conditions like those found in England. The article highlights the shortcomings of current replacements in the number three slot and the over-reliance on all-rounders to provide stability, further emphasizing the need for a seasoned batsman like Kohli. The analysis extends beyond mere batting statistics, emphasizing Kohli's ability to motivate the team, his tactical acumen in reading the game, and his overall impact on the team's morale and performance. The author uses examples from Kohli's past performances, such as his innings in Edgbaston in 2018 and his leadership during the 2021 Lord's Test, to illustrate his point about Kohli's transformative effect on the team. However, the article also acknowledges the complexities surrounding Kohli's retirement, pointing to disagreements with the selectors and coach Gautam Gambhir regarding captaincy and his role within the team. The author suggests that Kohli's decision to retire was driven by a lack of motivation stemming from these disagreements. The article concludes by questioning whether the BCCI and Gambhir can create an environment that would entice Kohli to return, acknowledging that the decision ultimately rests on Kohli's personal conviction and desire to play. The author frames Kohli's potential return as a redemption story, suggesting that it could restore his legacy and fulfill the untapped potential that remains. The article further ends with a humorous and elaborate plea, imploring the BCCI and Gambhir to actively pursue Kohli's return, emphasizing the perceived need for his leadership and batting expertise to once again elevate the Indian cricket team to its former glory. It underscores the fans' desire to see Kohli back in action and reinforces the narrative that his absence has created a void that only he can fill. The author’s style combines serious analysis with a touch of humor and strong opinions, adding a layer of entertainment to the critical examination of Kohli’s possible un-retirement.
The analysis of India's batting performance emphasizes the instability and reliance on all-rounders. Sai Sudarshan and Karun Nair are cited as examples of players who have struggled to solidify their positions in the batting order. Sudarshan's technical deficiencies against the moving ball and Nair's inability to convert starts into substantial scores are highlighted as significant concerns. The article argues that this lack of stability in the middle order forces India to compromise on its bowling attack, leading to the exclusion of attacking bowlers like Kuldeep Yadav and placing undue pressure on the pace bowlers. The Oval Test match is used as a case study to illustrate this point, highlighting the team's reluctance to utilize Jadeja and Washington, which resulted in the pacers being overworked. The author credits rain breaks for providing the pacers with much-needed respite, allowing them to mount spirited assaults. In contrast, Kohli's extensive experience, particularly in English conditions, is presented as a superior alternative. Despite acknowledging recent form fluctuations in Australia, the author emphasizes Kohli's willingness to adapt his game to the specific challenges of playing in England. At 36, Kohli is portrayed as being in his prime, deserving of further opportunities to anchor India's batting lineup. The author acknowledges criticism of Kohli's recent failures, noting his declining average and struggles to score big runs in Tests since 2021. However, the article counters this criticism by highlighting Kohli's form in other formats of the game, such as the Champions Trophy, which demonstrates his ability to perform on the big stage with passion. The author argues that Kohli is just one great knock away from rediscovering his Test-match skills and temperament. The article attributes Kohli's retirement to the myopic decisions of the BCCI and the perceived insecurity of Gambhir, suggesting that their actions effectively doused Kohli's fire. The author implicitly criticizes their handling of the situation, implying that they failed to recognize and appreciate Kohli's value to the team.
Beyond his batting prowess, Kohli's absence as a leader and motivator is presented as a significant loss for the Indian team. The article highlights Kohli's animated celebrations, aggressive on-field demeanor, and ability to rally crowds as key factors that galvanize the team and intimidate the opposition. Anecdotes from Kohli's career are used to illustrate his impact as a leader. His 149 in Edgbaston in 2018, scored under pressure and with a back injury, is cited as an example of his ability to inspire the team and nearly snatch victory. The fiery exchanges with England's tailenders during the 2021 Lord's Test are also mentioned, emphasizing Kohli's ability to spark the bowlers to deliver match-winning performances. The article asserts that Kohli's ability to read the game and provide valuable inputs on bowling and fielding changes has been sorely missed. The Root-Brook partnership is cited as an example where India's captain, Shubman Gill, appeared reactive and unable to disrupt the flow. The author suggests that Kohli, with his knack for breaking partnerships through sheer will, might have altered the narrative. The absence of Kohli's aggressive leadership style is contrasted with Gill's more mild-mannered approach. The author suggests that Gill's attempt to adopt a more aggressive persona, perhaps inspired by Kohli or Rohit Sharma, ultimately affected his performance negatively. The article concludes by acknowledging that Kohli's retirement was a personal choice driven by frustration. However, it suggests that the door remains ajar for a comeback if his passion can be reignited. The article frames Kohli's potential return as a crucial factor in India's transitional phase. The author raises the question of whether the BCCI and Gambhir can create the conditions necessary to lure Kohli back, or whether his Test legacy will remain a tale of unfulfilled potential. The final paragraph is a passionate plea, urging the BCCI and Gambhir to actively pursue Kohli's return, emphasizing the perceived need for his leadership and batting expertise to elevate the Indian cricket team to its former glory.
Source: Shashi Tharoor wants Virat Kohli to unretire. BCCI, Gambhir should coax him back