 |
|
The upcoming Vice-Presidential election in India has garnered significant attention, particularly due to the candidacy of B. Sudershan Reddy, a former Supreme Court judge. The political landscape is witnessing interesting dynamics as Reddy, backed by the opposition INDIA bloc, seeks support from beyond the coalition, appealing to members of all political parties to transcend partisan lines and evaluate his candidature based on merit and principle. This election, necessitated by the sudden resignation of the incumbent Jagdeep Dhankhar, is perceived by the opposition as an ideological battle, although the numerical strength lies with the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA). The contest pits Reddy against C.P. Radhakrishnan, the NDA nominee, setting the stage for what has been described as a 'south versus south' battle, given that both candidates hail from South India. Reddy's appeal for cross-party support underscores the nuanced nature of Indian politics, where consensus-building and broader acceptance often play a crucial role in electoral outcomes. The mention of support from outside the INDIA bloc, without specifying who those supporters are, adds an element of intrigue and speculation. This could potentially indicate outreach to regional parties or individual parliamentarians who may be disillusioned with the existing political alignments. Reddy's acknowledgement of Akhilesh Yadav's support highlights the significance of regional leaders and their influence in shaping national political discourse. The Vice-Presidential election holds symbolic importance, as it reflects the balance of power between the ruling dispensation and the opposition, and provides an opportunity for different ideologies and perspectives to be represented in the highest echelons of governance. Reddy's background as a jurist, known for his landmark judgments criticizing governmental slackness in probing black money cases, adds weight to his candidature and positions him as a figure of integrity and independence. The allegations leveled against him by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, accusing him of supporting Maoism, are indicative of the adversarial nature of political campaigns, where character assassination and mudslinging are often employed to tarnish the image of opponents. Reddy's measured response to these allegations, refusing to expand the debate and referring to his previous statements in newspapers, suggests a strategic approach aimed at minimizing the impact of the accusations. His decision not to delve into political issues, citing the non-political nature of the Vice-Presidential office, reflects an understanding of the constitutional role and responsibilities of the position. The election outcome will not only determine the next Vice-President but also provide insights into the evolving political alliances and the shifting dynamics of Indian politics. The stakes are high, and the outcome will have far-reaching implications for the country's governance and political landscape. The narrative around 'south versus south' adds another layer of complexity, highlighting regional identities and the representation of different parts of India in national leadership positions. Ultimately, the Vice-Presidential election is a significant event that underscores the democratic processes and the ongoing contestation of power in India. The outcome will be closely watched and analyzed for its implications on the future direction of the country's political trajectory. The support Sudershan Reddy has garnered will also be a key factor that may dictate a shift in political strategies in the future. The veteran Jurist's experience and background set him apart from other possible candidates for the role of Vice President and will play a role in the votes he may or may not receive in the future. His emphasis on the non-political role that the Vice-President plays may also appeal to members from both sides of the political aisle. The fact that this role is necessary due to the recent resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar is something to be considered. Dhankhar's service was ended unexpectedly, which in turn shifted focus to the position and the upcoming election for a new candidate to fill the void. Reddy's appeal to rise above party lines will be a major factor in whether or not he is considered a viable candidate in the eyes of his constituents.
The Vice-Presidential election in India is more than just a contest between two individuals; it represents a clash of ideologies, political strategies, and regional aspirations. The candidature of B. Sudershan Reddy, a former Supreme Court judge, has injected a new dimension into the electoral landscape, as he seeks support from beyond the confines of the opposition INDIA bloc. His appeal for cross-party backing underscores the importance of consensus-building and the recognition of merit and principle in public service. The political narrative surrounding the election is further complicated by allegations leveled against Reddy by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, accusing him of supporting Maoism. This reflects the often-contentious nature of political campaigns, where personal attacks and unsubstantiated claims are used to discredit opponents. Reddy's measured response to these allegations, avoiding further escalation and referencing his previous statements, demonstrates a strategic approach to damage control. The description of the election as a 'south versus south' battle highlights the regional dynamics at play, with both Reddy and his opponent, C.P. Radhakrishnan, hailing from South India. This adds another layer of complexity to the electoral calculus, as regional identities and considerations may influence voting patterns. The fact that the election was necessitated by the sudden resignation of the incumbent Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar raises questions about the stability and continuity of leadership in key governmental positions. The opposition's portrayal of the election as an ideological battle underscores the fundamental differences in political philosophies and policy approaches between the ruling NDA and the opposition INDIA bloc. Reddy's background as a jurist, known for his landmark judgments criticizing governmental inaction in black money cases, positions him as a figure of integrity and independence. This may appeal to voters who are seeking a leader with a strong moral compass and a commitment to upholding the rule of law. His decision not to engage in political debates, citing the non-political nature of the Vice-Presidential office, reflects a deep understanding of the constitutional role and responsibilities of the position. The election outcome will have significant implications for the balance of power between the ruling and opposition parties, as well as the representation of different ideologies and perspectives in the highest echelons of governance. Reddy's ability to garner support from beyond the INDIA bloc will be a key factor in determining his chances of success. The election also serves as a barometer of the public's sentiment towards the ruling NDA and the opposition INDIA bloc, providing insights into the evolving political landscape. The Vice-Presidential election is a crucial event that underscores the democratic processes and the ongoing contestation of power in India. The outcome will be closely watched and analyzed for its implications on the future direction of the country's political trajectory. The role itself holds specific responsibilities in the way that government is run in India, and the man who is chosen for the role will need to be able to meet the responsibilities of the position.
The dynamics surrounding the Vice-Presidential election in India reveal the intricate interplay of political alliances, regional identities, and ideological clashes. B. Sudershan Reddy's candidacy, backed by the opposition INDIA bloc, has introduced a compelling narrative as he seeks support from beyond the coalition. His appeal for cross-party backing resonates with the principle of meritocracy and the need for individuals to transcend partisan lines in the pursuit of public service. However, the political landscape is not without its challenges, as evidenced by the allegations leveled against Reddy by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, accusing him of supporting Maoism. This highlights the often-adversarial nature of political campaigns, where personal attacks and unsubstantiated claims can be employed to undermine opponents. Reddy's strategic response to these allegations, refraining from further escalation and referencing his previous statements, underscores the importance of effective communication and damage control in the face of adversity. The characterization of the election as a 'south versus south' battle underscores the significance of regional considerations in Indian politics, with both Reddy and his opponent, C.P. Radhakrishnan, hailing from South India. This can influence voting patterns and create a sense of regional representation in national leadership positions. The unexpected necessity for the election, triggered by the sudden resignation of the incumbent Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar, raises concerns about the stability and continuity of leadership in key governmental roles. The opposition's framing of the election as an ideological battle underscores the fundamental differences in political philosophies and policy approaches between the ruling NDA and the opposition INDIA bloc. Reddy's background as a jurist, known for his landmark judgments criticizing governmental inaction in black money cases, positions him as a figure of integrity and independence. This can resonate with voters who seek leaders with a strong ethical compass and a commitment to upholding the rule of law. His decision not to engage in political debates, citing the non-political nature of the Vice-Presidential office, reflects a deep understanding of the constitutional role and responsibilities of the position. The election outcome will have far-reaching implications for the balance of power between the ruling and opposition parties, as well as the representation of diverse ideologies and perspectives in the highest echelons of governance. Reddy's ability to garner support from beyond the INDIA bloc will be crucial to his success. The election also serves as a reflection of public sentiment towards the ruling NDA and the opposition INDIA bloc, providing insights into the evolving political landscape. In essence, the Vice-Presidential election is a pivotal event that underscores the democratic processes and the ongoing contestation of power in India. The outcome will be closely watched and analyzed for its implications on the future direction of the country's political trajectory. It will play a role in where political strategies are employed for future elections and for what reasons people are being put into these political positions.
The Vice-Presidential election in India, particularly with the candidacy of B. Sudershan Reddy, reveals the nuanced dynamics of Indian politics, shaped by alliances, regional identities, and ideological differences. Reddy's pursuit of support beyond the INDIA bloc highlights the need for consensus-building and recognition of merit in public service. However, the campaign faces challenges, as evidenced by the allegations made by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, accusing Reddy of supporting Maoism. This exemplifies the adversarial nature of political campaigns, where attacks are used to discredit opponents. Reddy's strategic response involves avoiding further escalation and referencing past statements. The 'south versus south' framing underscores the importance of regional considerations in Indian politics, potentially influencing voting patterns. The election's necessity, due to the unexpected resignation of Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar, raises questions about leadership stability. The opposition's portrayal of the election as an ideological battle highlights the fundamental differences between the ruling NDA and the INDIA bloc. Reddy's background as a jurist, known for criticizing governmental inaction on black money, positions him as a figure of integrity. His decision to avoid political debates reflects an understanding of the Vice-Presidential role. The election's outcome will significantly impact the balance of power and the representation of diverse viewpoints. Reddy's ability to garner support will be crucial, as will public sentiment towards the NDA and INDIA bloc. The Vice-Presidential election underscores the democratic processes in India, and its outcome will be closely analyzed for its future political implications. The role of VP has also come under scrutiny for the events that lead to the current situation. Dhankhar's unpredicted departure has forced a shift into the VP race, and Reddy is hoping to garner support from all parties in the race. The circumstances surrounding the need for this election have led to a larger focus than the position has held in the past. His appeal for the race is based on merit and principle, and he hopes this will appeal to those making decisions at the polls. The events that led to this point have also become a key factor, and it will be interesting to see how the future of the election plays out.
Examining the Vice-Presidential election in India, particularly through B. Sudershan Reddy's candidacy, illuminates the complexities of the nation's political landscape. This landscape is woven with threads of alliance strategies, regional identities, and distinct ideological camps. Reddy's active pursuit of backing that transcends the INDIA bloc signifies a broader appeal for consensus and a validation of merit in public service. Yet, the road to the Vice-Presidency is not without its obstacles. Accusations leveled against Reddy by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, accusing him of harboring sympathies towards Maoism, underscores the often combative tenor of political campaigns. Such tactics, designed to erode an opponent’s credibility, necessitate a measured response. Reddy's strategic approach, characterized by avoiding further confrontation and alluding to past statements, underscores the importance of adept communication and proactive damage control in the face of adversity. The narrative of a 'south versus south' contest underscores the enduring influence of regional factors within Indian politics. With both Reddy and his opponent, C.P. Radhakrishnan, originating from South India, regional allegiances may well exert a significant influence on voter behavior and foster a sense of inclusivity in national leadership. The unexpected vacancy necessitating this election, stemming from the sudden departure of incumbent Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar, inevitably raises inquiries regarding the stability and consistent leadership in pivotal governmental roles. The opposition's depiction of the election as an ideological struggle emphasizes the fundamental divergences in political principles and policy approaches that divide the ruling NDA coalition and the opposition INDIA bloc. Reddy's distinguished background as a jurist, celebrated for his critical scrutiny of governmental inertia regarding black money cases, positions him as an emblem of probity and independence. Such a reputation may attract voters seeking leadership characterized by strong ethical principles and a steadfast commitment to upholding the rule of law. His choice to abstain from engaging in overtly political debates, emphasizing the non-partisan nature of the Vice-Presidential office, showcases a profound comprehension of the constitutional responsibilities inherent in the position. The election's outcome will yield far-reaching implications for the distribution of power among the ruling and opposition factions, and the representation of a spectrum of ideologies within the highest spheres of governance. Reddy's capacity to garner support beyond the confines of the INDIA bloc will be pivotal in shaping his trajectory towards success. The election also serves as an indicator of public sentiment toward both the ruling NDA and the opposition INDIA bloc, affording insights into the ever-shifting political currents. Fundamentally, the Vice-Presidential election embodies the essence of democratic processes and the continuous contestation of power within India. Its resolution will be closely observed and analyzed, given its consequential implications for the nation's future political course. The role of the Vice-President has come into question given the nature of the sudden requirement, and the events that have led to this point are sure to affect the outcome of this election.
India's upcoming Vice-Presidential election, highlighted by B. Sudershan Reddy's candidacy, provides a lens into the country's complex political interactions, marked by the dance of alliances, regional identities, and distinct ideological viewpoints. Reddy's active quest for support beyond the INDIA bloc underscores a larger call for consensus and a validation of merit in public service. Yet, the road to the Vice-Presidency is laden with challenges. The accusations leveled against Reddy by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, alleging sympathies towards Maoism, illustrate the frequently combative nature of political campaigns, wherein such attacks aim to tarnish the opponent's reputation. Reddy's strategic riposte—evading further escalation and alluding to past statements—highlights the significance of adept communication and preemptive damage control. The framing of the contest as a 'south versus south' battle underscores the enduring influence of regional considerations within Indian politics. Given that both Reddy and C.P. Radhakrishnan originate from South India, regional allegiances could significantly influence voter sentiment and cultivate a sense of inclusivity within national leadership. The unexpected need for this election—precipitated by the sudden departure of incumbent Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar—raises questions regarding stability and consistent leadership within critical governmental roles. The opposition's depiction of the election as an ideological struggle underscores the fundamental divergences in political principles and policy approaches that divide the ruling NDA coalition and the opposition INDIA bloc. Reddy's esteemed background as a jurist, renowned for his critical scrutiny of governmental inaction on black money cases, positions him as an embodiment of probity and independence. Such a reputation might attract voters seeking leaders characterized by robust ethical principles and unwavering commitment to upholding the rule of law. His choice to abstain from engaging in overtly political debates, underscoring the non-partisan nature of the Vice-Presidential office, showcases a profound comprehension of the constitutional responsibilities inherent in the position. The election's outcome will yield far-reaching implications for the distribution of power among the ruling and opposition factions, as well as the representation of a spectrum of ideologies within the highest spheres of governance. Reddy's capacity to garner support beyond the INDIA bloc will prove pivotal in shaping his trajectory towards success. Moreover, the election serves as an indicator of public sentiment toward both the ruling NDA and the opposition INDIA bloc, affording insights into the ever-shifting political currents. In essence, the Vice-Presidential election embodies the essence of democratic processes and the continuous contestation of power within India, necessitating close observation and analysis, given its consequential implications for the nation's future political trajectory. The implications of this race and the events that lead to the election have shifted the focus to the role of the Vice-President in India.
The Vice-Presidential election in India, brought into sharper focus by the candidacy of B. Sudershan Reddy, serves as a compelling study of the nation's intricate political web. This web is intricately woven with strands of strategic alliances, strong regional identities, and distinct ideological divides. Reddy's proactive campaign to secure support that extends beyond the boundaries of the INDIA bloc underscores a wider quest for consensus and a recognition of meritocracy in public service. However, the path to the Vice-Presidency is hardly devoid of its challenges. The allegations made against Reddy by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, accusing him of harboring sympathies toward Maoism, are a stark reminder of the frequently combative nature of political campaigns. These are campaigns where attempts to undermine an opponent's credibility are common practice. Reddy's strategic response—marked by a refusal to engage in further escalation and a deliberate reference to his past statements—highlights the critical importance of skillful communication and proactive damage control in the face of adversity. The characterization of the election as a 'south versus south' battle underscores the enduring significance of regional dynamics in Indian politics. With both Reddy and his opponent, C.P. Radhakrishnan, hailing from the southern regions of India, it is highly probable that regional allegiances will exert considerable influence on voter sentiment and contribute to a heightened sense of inclusivity in national leadership. The unexpected circumstance that necessitated this election—the sudden departure of the incumbent Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar—inescapably raises pertinent questions about the overall stability and consistent leadership within essential governmental roles. The opposition's portrayal of the election as an ideological battle emphasizes the fundamental divergences in political principles and policy approaches that divide the ruling NDA coalition and the opposition INDIA bloc. Reddy's esteemed background as a legal scholar, highly regarded for his critical examination of governmental inaction on matters of black money, positions him as an embodiment of integrity and unwavering independence. It is highly probable that such a reputation will appeal to voters who actively seek leaders characterized by robust ethical principles and an unwavering commitment to upholding the rule of law. His conscious decision to abstain from participating in overtly political debates, thereby emphasizing the non-partisan nature of the Vice-Presidential office, exemplifies a profound understanding of the constitutional responsibilities that inherently accompany the position. The ultimate outcome of this election will have far-reaching implications for the distribution of power among the ruling and opposition factions, as well as the fair and equitable representation of a broad spectrum of ideologies within the highest echelons of the Indian government. Reddy's capacity to garner support that transcends the boundaries of the INDIA bloc will undoubtedly prove pivotal in shaping his trajectory toward eventual success. Moreover, this election serves as a valuable barometer of public sentiment towards both the ruling NDA and the opposition INDIA bloc, offering valuable insights into the constantly evolving currents of the Indian political landscape. In its very essence, the Vice-Presidential election encapsulates the heart of democratic processes and the continuous contestation of power within India, and it undoubtedly warrants close observation and thorough analysis, given its consequential implications for the nation's future political course. The events that have occurred surrounding this election has made many people take notice of the role of the Vice-President.
Analyzing the Vice-Presidential election in India through the lens of B. Sudershan Reddy's candidacy offers a valuable perspective on the country's complex political interplay. This interplay is characterized by strategic alliances, regional identities, and ideological divides. Reddy's active pursuit of support beyond the INDIA bloc underscores a broader call for consensus-building and a recognition of merit in public service. However, the path to the Vice-Presidency is not without its challenges. The allegations leveled against Reddy by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, accusing him of supporting Maoism, illustrate the frequently combative nature of political campaigns, wherein attempts to undermine an opponent's credibility are common. Reddy's strategic response—avoiding further escalation and alluding to past statements—highlights the importance of skilled communication and preemptive damage control. The framing of the contest as a 'south versus south' battle underscores the enduring influence of regional considerations in Indian politics. Given that both Reddy and his opponent, C.P. Radhakrishnan, originate from South India, regional allegiances could significantly influence voter sentiment and cultivate a sense of inclusivity within national leadership. The unexpected need for this election—precipitated by the sudden departure of incumbent Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar—raises questions regarding stability and consistent leadership within critical governmental roles. The opposition's depiction of the election as an ideological struggle underscores the fundamental divergences in political principles and policy approaches that divide the ruling NDA coalition and the opposition INDIA bloc. Reddy's esteemed background as a jurist, renowned for his critical scrutiny of governmental inaction on black money cases, positions him as an embodiment of integrity and independence. Such a reputation might attract voters seeking leaders characterized by robust ethical principles and unwavering commitment to upholding the rule of law. His choice to abstain from engaging in overtly political debates, underscoring the non-partisan nature of the Vice-Presidential office, showcases a profound comprehension of the constitutional responsibilities inherent in the position. The election's outcome will yield far-reaching implications for the distribution of power among the ruling and opposition factions, as well as the representation of a spectrum of ideologies within the highest spheres of governance. Reddy's capacity to garner support beyond the INDIA bloc will prove pivotal in shaping his trajectory towards success. Moreover, the election serves as an indicator of public sentiment toward both the ruling NDA and the opposition INDIA bloc, affording insights into the ever-shifting political currents. In essence, the Vice-Presidential election embodies the essence of democratic processes and the continuous contestation of power within India, necessitating close observation and analysis, given its consequential implications for the nation's future political trajectory. The events that have recently happened have caused many to be more aware of the role of Vice-President in India.
The Vice-Presidential election in India, marked by the presence of B. Sudershan Reddy as a candidate, presents a complex and fascinating study of the nation's political landscape. This landscape is characterized by its interwoven strategic alliances, strong regional identities, and distinct ideological positions. Reddy's proactive effort to secure support beyond the INDIA bloc is a sign of his broad appeal for consensus and a recognition of merit in public service. However, the road to the Vice-Presidency is not without its obstacles. The allegations made against Reddy by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, accusing him of sympathizing with Maoism, is a clear indication of the frequently contentious nature of political campaigns, where attempts to undermine the reputation of opponents is common. Reddy's strategic response—a refusal to further escalate the situation and a deliberate reference to his past statements—highlights the critical role of skillful communication and a proactive approach to damage control. The characterization of the election as a 'south versus south' battle emphasizes the enduring significance of regional dynamics in Indian politics. Given that both Reddy and C.P. Radhakrishnan originate from the southern regions of India, it is likely that regional affiliations will influence voter sentiment and contribute to a heightened sense of inclusivity in national leadership. The unexpected circumstance that necessitated this election—the sudden resignation of the current Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar—inevitably raises valid questions regarding the stability and consistent leadership within key governmental positions. The opposition's portrayal of the election as an ideological battle emphasizes the fundamental differences in political principles and policy approaches that divide the ruling NDA coalition and the opposition INDIA bloc. Reddy's highly respected background as a legal scholar, who is recognized for his critical examination of the government's inaction regarding the issue of black money, positions him as a symbol of integrity and unwavering independence. It is likely that this kind of reputation will appeal to voters who seek leaders who are characterized by strong ethical principles and an unwavering commitment to the rule of law. His conscious decision to abstain from actively participating in political debates, while underscoring the non-partisan nature of the Vice-Presidential office, exemplifies a deep understanding of the constitutional responsibilities that come with the position. The outcome of this election will have far-reaching implications for the allocation of power between the ruling and opposition groups, as well as for the fair and equal representation of a wide spectrum of ideologies within the highest levels of the Indian government. Reddy's ability to gain the support of groups beyond the INDIA bloc will play a crucial role in shaping his trajectory towards success. In addition, the election provides a useful indicator of the public's sentiment towards both the ruling NDA and the opposition INDIA bloc, offering valuable insights into the continually evolving trends in the Indian political landscape. In its purest form, the Vice-Presidential election embodies the democratic processes and the ongoing competition for power within India, and it undeniably warrants close observation and thorough analysis due to its meaningful implications for the country's future political direction. The events of recent days have brought more attention to the role of Vice-President than in the past.
The Vice-Presidential election in India, particularly as illuminated by the candidacy of B. Sudershan Reddy, provides a compelling case study in the dynamics of the country's political landscape. This landscape is intricately woven with threads of strategic alliances, regional identities, and distinct ideological leanings. Reddy's proactive pursuit of support beyond the INDIA bloc is indicative of a broader appeal for consensus and a validation of merit in public service. However, the journey to the Vice-Presidency is not without its inherent obstacles. The allegations leveled against Reddy by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, accusing him of holding sympathies towards Maoism, serve as a stark reminder of the often combative nature of political campaigns. These are campaigns where attempts to undermine an opponent's credibility are commonplace. Reddy's strategic response—characterized by a measured avoidance of further escalation and a deliberate reference to his past statements—highlights the critical importance of adept communication and a proactive approach to damage control in the face of adversity. The narrative of a 'south versus south' contest underscores the enduring significance of regional dynamics within the context of Indian politics. With both Reddy and his opponent, C.P. Radhakrishnan, hailing from the southern regions of India, regional allegiances are likely to exert a considerable influence on voter sentiment and contribute to a heightened sense of inclusivity in national leadership. The unexpected circumstance that necessitated this election—the sudden departure of the incumbent Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar—inevitably raises important questions regarding the stability and consistent leadership within essential governmental roles. The opposition's depiction of the election as an ideological battle emphasizes the fundamental divergences in political principles and policy approaches that divide the ruling NDA coalition and the opposition INDIA bloc. Reddy's esteemed background as a legal scholar, who is highly regarded for his critical examination of governmental inaction on matters of black money, positions him as an embodiment of integrity and unwavering independence. Such a reputation will undoubtedly appeal to voters who actively seek leaders characterized by robust ethical principles and an unwavering commitment to upholding the rule of law. His conscious decision to abstain from engaging in overtly political debates, thereby emphasizing the non-partisan nature of the Vice-Presidential office, exemplifies a deep understanding of the constitutional responsibilities that inherently accompany the position. The ultimate outcome of this election will have far-reaching implications for the distribution of power among the ruling and opposition factions, and for the fair and equitable representation of a broad spectrum of ideologies within the highest echelons of the Indian government. Reddy's capacity to garner support that transcends the boundaries of the INDIA bloc will undoubtedly prove pivotal in shaping his trajectory towards success. Moreover, this election serves as a valuable barometer of public sentiment towards both the ruling NDA and the opposition INDIA bloc, offering valuable insights into the constantly evolving currents of the Indian political landscape. At its core, the Vice-Presidential election encapsulates the essence of democratic processes and the continuous contestation of power within India, and it undoubtedly warrants close observation and thorough analysis, given its consequential implications for the nation's future political course. With the recent happenings surrounding the election, there has been a shift towards recognizing the important of the office of Vice-President.
Source: Grateful that people outside INDIA bloc alliance coming forward to help, says Sudershan Reddy