Ashwin criticizes India's bowling strategy, defensive pressure building is needed

Ashwin criticizes India's bowling strategy, defensive pressure building is needed
  • Ashwin criticizes India's bowling for lacking defensive pressure building skill.
  • He says defensive pressure building is a lost art now.
  • Modern bowlers focus too much on wickets, concede many runs.

Ravichandran Ashwin, the seasoned Indian off-spinner, has offered a critical assessment of the Indian cricket team's bowling performance in the ongoing Test series against England. While acknowledging the team's overall efforts, Ashwin pinpointed a crucial area where he believes the Shubman Gill-led side has fallen short: the art of building pressure through disciplined and strategic bowling, often referred to as 'defensive pressure building.' In his YouTube show, 'Ash Ki Baat,' Ashwin articulated his concerns, stating that India, despite accumulating significant runs on the pitch, found themselves in a precarious position due to the team's inability to consistently apply pressure on the English batsmen through sustained, accurate, and strategically varied bowling. Ashwin's analysis extends beyond the Indian team, suggesting that this deficiency is not unique to them but rather a widespread trend in modern cricket, with the exception of the Australian team, who according to him, still retain the ability to effectively build defensive pressure. This observation highlights a significant shift in bowling philosophies and strategies within the contemporary game. The increasing prevalence of T20 cricket, with its emphasis on aggressive, wicket-taking deliveries, has inadvertently led to a decline in the more subtle and nuanced art of patiently constructing pressure through disciplined line and length bowling, coupled with clever variations and strategic field placements. Ashwin argues that bowlers are increasingly prioritizing the pursuit of immediate wickets, often at the expense of conceding runs, which ultimately undermines their ability to control the game and dictate terms to the opposition batsmen. He emphasizes that wickets are not merely obtained through aggressive bowling alone but are often the result of sustained pressure, which creates opportunities for batsmen to make mistakes or take unnecessary risks. The build-up of pressure, he explains, involves a combination of factors, including consistent accuracy, strategic variations, and the establishment of a rhythm that allows the bowlers to control the flow of the game. By building pressure, bowlers can create a sense of unease among the batsmen, forcing them to play shots they might not otherwise attempt, thereby increasing their chances of getting dismissed. In the context of Test cricket, where patience and perseverance are paramount, the ability to build defensive pressure is particularly crucial. Test matches are often won or lost based on the ability of a team to sustain pressure over long periods, wearing down the opposition and creating opportunities for breakthroughs. Ashwin's remarks underscore the importance of adapting bowling strategies to suit the specific conditions and demands of each format of the game. While aggressive, wicket-taking bowling may be effective in T20 cricket, a more nuanced and strategic approach is often required in Test cricket, where the emphasis is on building pressure and wearing down the opposition. The decline in defensive pressure building can be attributed to several factors, including the influence of T20 cricket, the increasing emphasis on individual statistics, and the lack of specialized training in this aspect of the game. T20 cricket has undoubtedly revolutionized the game, but it has also had unintended consequences, including the decline in traditional skills and strategies that are essential for success in Test cricket. The increasing emphasis on individual statistics, such as wickets taken and runs scored, has also contributed to the decline in defensive pressure building. Bowlers are often judged based on their wicket-taking ability, which encourages them to focus on aggressive bowling at the expense of other aspects of the game. Furthermore, there is a lack of specialized training in the art of defensive pressure building. Many coaches and trainers focus on teaching bowlers how to take wickets, but they often neglect the importance of building pressure through disciplined line and length bowling, coupled with clever variations and strategic field placements. To address this issue, it is essential to re-emphasize the importance of defensive pressure building in cricket training and development programs. Coaches and trainers should focus on teaching bowlers how to bowl with accuracy, consistency, and strategic variation, and how to use field placements to create pressure on the batsmen. Additionally, it is important to promote a culture of patience and perseverance, encouraging bowlers to focus on building pressure over long periods rather than solely pursuing immediate wickets. By instilling these values and skills, cricket can help to ensure that the art of defensive pressure building is not lost and that bowlers are equipped to succeed in all formats of the game.

Ashwin's critique also implicitly suggests a broader issue within the Indian bowling setup: a possible over-reliance on aggressive tactics, possibly stemming from the perceived need to force results, especially in conditions that may not be overtly conducive to spin or seam movement. While India has produced some exceptional fast bowlers in recent years, the constant pursuit of wickets through sheer pace and aggression might be overshadowing the importance of control and consistency. A more balanced approach, incorporating elements of both aggression and containment, could potentially yield better results in the long run. Furthermore, Ashwin's observation about Australia highlights the significance of a well-defined bowling culture. Australian cricket has traditionally emphasized the importance of relentless accuracy, sustained pressure, and a deep understanding of the game's nuances. This culture, passed down through generations of players, has instilled in Australian bowlers a natural inclination to prioritize control and consistency over immediate gratification. India, on the other hand, may need to consciously cultivate a similar bowling culture, emphasizing the importance of patience, strategic thinking, and the ability to adapt to different conditions. This could involve implementing specialized coaching programs, promoting mentorship opportunities, and fostering a greater appreciation for the art of defensive pressure building. The success of the Australian team in retaining the art of defensive pressure building could also be attributed to the structure of their domestic cricket system. The Sheffield Shield, Australia's premier first-class competition, provides a platform for bowlers to hone their skills in challenging conditions and develop a deep understanding of the game. The Shield matches are often played on surfaces that require bowlers to work hard for their wickets, forcing them to rely on accuracy, consistency, and strategic variation rather than sheer pace or aggression. India, on the other hand, may need to strengthen its domestic cricket system to provide a more challenging and competitive environment for bowlers. This could involve improving the quality of pitches, promoting greater competition for places in the national team, and providing more opportunities for young bowlers to learn from experienced players. Ultimately, Ashwin's critique serves as a valuable reminder of the importance of a balanced and nuanced approach to bowling. While aggressive, wicket-taking deliveries are undoubtedly important, they should not come at the expense of control, consistency, and the ability to build defensive pressure. By re-emphasizing the importance of these fundamental skills and fostering a culture of patience and strategic thinking, India can help to ensure that its bowlers are equipped to succeed in all formats of the game.

Moreover, Ashwin's analysis extends beyond the immediate tactical deficiencies and touches upon a deeper philosophical shift in how cricket, particularly bowling, is perceived and taught in the modern era. The pervasive influence of data analytics and performance metrics, while undeniably valuable in certain contexts, might inadvertently be contributing to the neglect of more subtle and intuitive aspects of the game. Bowlers are often judged based on quantifiable metrics such as economy rate, strike rate, and average, which can incentivize them to prioritize certain types of deliveries or strategies over others. While these metrics can provide valuable insights into a bowler's performance, they should not be the sole determinants of success. The art of bowling also involves intangible qualities such as intuition, adaptability, and the ability to read the batsman's mind. These qualities are difficult to quantify but are nonetheless essential for success at the highest level. In addition to data analytics, the increasing commercialization of cricket has also contributed to the decline in defensive pressure building. The pressure to entertain and provide value for money often leads to an emphasis on aggressive, high-scoring cricket at the expense of more traditional and nuanced forms of the game. Bowlers are often encouraged to bowl aggressively and take wickets, even if it means conceding runs. This can lead to a situation where bowlers prioritize immediate gratification over long-term strategy. To address these issues, it is essential to promote a more holistic and nuanced approach to cricket training and development. Coaches and trainers should focus on developing not only the technical skills of bowlers but also their mental and tactical abilities. They should also encourage bowlers to trust their instincts and develop their own unique styles of bowling. Furthermore, it is important to create a more balanced and sustainable commercial model for cricket that does not prioritize entertainment over all other considerations. This could involve promoting more Test cricket, reducing the number of T20 matches, and encouraging broadcasters to focus on the strategic and tactical aspects of the game. In conclusion, Ravichandran Ashwin's critique of India's bowling performance highlights the importance of defensive pressure building in modern cricket. While aggressive, wicket-taking deliveries are undoubtedly important, they should not come at the expense of control, consistency, and the ability to build pressure. By re-emphasizing the importance of these fundamental skills and fostering a culture of patience and strategic thinking, India can help to ensure that its bowlers are equipped to succeed in all formats of the game. Furthermore, it is important to promote a more holistic and nuanced approach to cricket training and development, taking into account not only the technical skills of bowlers but also their mental and tactical abilities. By addressing these issues, cricket can help to ensure that the art of defensive pressure building is not lost and that bowlers are equipped to succeed in all formats of the game.

Source: ‘India have failed in one place’: Ravichandran Ashwin points out how defensive pressure building is lost art in modern game

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post