 |
|
Gowtham Tinnanuri's “Kingdom” opens with a visually arresting prologue, set in 1920, showcasing a tribal community’s valiant resistance against British colonial forces seeking to exploit their land for gold. This initial sequence, marked by gripping action and cinematic promise, unfortunately represents the film’s peak. The narrative then shifts to the 1990s, introducing Soori, played by Vijay Deverakonda, a police constable driven by the relentless search for his long-lost brother, Srinu. This sets the stage for a complex undercover operation that takes Soori to the volatile backdrop of the Sri Lankan civil war. While the film displays ambition in its scope and visual presentation, it is ultimately undermined by a series of critical flaws, including incoherent writing, underdeveloped characterization, and a superficial engagement with the historical context of the conflict. The article underscores the disappointment arising from the film's failure to capitalize on its potential, leaving viewers with a sense of unfulfilled expectations. The storyline involving Soori’s relentless search for his brother, fueled by a childhood photograph and a questionable police sketch artist (who manages to extrapolate adult features from a child’s image – a plot hole explicitly called out by the reviewer), takes him into a dangerous world of smuggling and political intrigue. The setting of the Sri Lankan civil war, rife with historical complexities and nuanced relationships between the Tamil and Sinhalese populations, is treated with a surprising level of detachment. Instead of delving into the political and social realities of the conflict, the film uses it merely as a backdrop for stylized action sequences and gunfights. This reduction of a complex historical event to a mere spectacle is a major disservice to the narrative's potential depth. The portrayal of the fictional island of Divi and its tribal community is equally problematic. The Adivasis are depicted as being caught between the militant Tamils and a ruthless smuggling cartel, forced into illicit activities to ensure their survival. The film introduces a peculiar rule enforced by the cartel, forbidding Adivasi women from venturing onto the mainland, but fails to provide a compelling explanation or justification for this restriction. This lack of narrative coherence and logical inconsistencies further detract from the film's credibility and impact. The reviewer questions the logic behind sending Soori specifically on this dangerous mission, especially when the Indian government is implied to have already had a plan in motion. This point, along with several others, leads the reviewer to speculate whether the questions will be addressed in a potential sequel, but also highlights the film's shortcomings as a standalone narrative. The comparison to successful cinematic epics such as “KGF” and “Baahubali” further emphasizes the film's failure to deliver a complete and satisfying experience. The inclusion of a gruesome scene, reminiscent of the “red wedding” episode from “Game of Thrones”, adds to the film's tonal inconsistencies. The abrupt shift from mass murder to celebratory jubilation among the Adivasi community is described as jarring and difficult to overlook. The film also suffers from underdeveloped secondary characters. While Vijay Deverakonda delivers a commendable performance as Soori, the supporting cast, with the exception of Venkitesh who plays the villain Murugan, are relegated to the background, lacking sufficient depth and motivation. The relationship between Soori and his wife, played by Bhagyashri Borse, feels inorganic and underdeveloped, further highlighting the film's weakness in character development. The narrative structure culminates in a cliffhanger, hinting at the introduction of another villain in a potential second installment, similar to the narrative arc of “KGF.” Despite the film's shortcomings in writing and characterization, the reviewer acknowledges the strengths of its technical aspects. Girish Gangadharan’s cinematography is praised for its striking visuals, and Anirudh’s score is lauded for its powerful impact. However, these technical merits are ultimately insufficient to salvage the film from its fundamental flaws. The reviewer concludes that “Kingdom” ultimately falls short of its ambitious goals due to a lack of clarity, character depth, and emotional connection, which are essential ingredients for compelling storytelling. The reviewer makes a point of stating that the review was independent and free of any conflicts of interest related to the film’s production or cast.
Source: Kingdom review: Vijay Deverakonda’s film is ambitious but lacks heft