 |
|
Vishal Furia's 'Maa' emerges as a cinematic endeavor fraught with inconsistencies and thematic ambiguities, despite a commendable central performance by Kajol. The film attempts to weave together elements of faith, fear, and feudalism within a mythological drama set in a remote Bengali village, but ultimately falls short of delivering a cohesive and compelling narrative. The premise centers around an age-old curse that plagues the village, causing young girls to disappear and return with no memory of their experiences. Kajol portrays Ambika, a mother fiercely determined to protect her daughter from becoming the next victim of this sinister phenomenon. However, the film's execution is marred by erratic pacing, a lack of focus, and an inability to decide whether it wants to be a straight-up horror movie or a more nuanced exploration of good versus evil and maternal power. The narrative's foundation lies in a tragic event that occurred forty years prior, when a baby girl was murdered on the night of Kali Puja, leading to the unleashing of a curse upon the village. This curse manifests as a daitya, a demon associated with a fearsome giant tree, which terrorizes the community and specifically targets young girls on the verge of adulthood. The zamindar's son, Shuvankar, who was spared as a child, carries the weight of his family's dark secret and eventually returns to the village with his wife, Ambika, and daughter, Shweta. Upon their arrival, they are confronted with a series of unsettling events that expose the lurking dangers within the crumbling manor. While the film incorporates elements of religion and mythology, particularly through the presence of a Kali temple that has been shuttered for decades, it struggles to integrate these elements seamlessly into the overall narrative. The visual aspects of 'Maa' are undeniably captivating, with dimly lit interiors, discolored walls, and unsettling apparitions contributing to a sense of dread and foreboding. The VFX also play a role in creating chilling moments, but these visual strengths are ultimately undermined by a screenplay that lacks coherence and a narrative that loses its way as it progresses. The film's attempts to address themes of patriarchy and female empowerment are ultimately unsuccessful, as it becomes entangled in a web of superstition and mumbo-jumbo. The performances of the cast are generally commendable, with Kajol delivering a strong and committed portrayal of Ambika. Ronit Roy also shines in his role as the village headman, and the two young actresses, Kherin Sharma and Roopkatha Chakraborty, effectively convey the torment experienced by their characters. However, even the solid performances cannot compensate for the film's fundamental flaws in its screenplay and direction. 'Maa' ultimately fails to deliver on its potential, falling short of being either a truly terrifying horror movie or a thought-provoking mythological drama. Its lack of focus, incoherent narrative, and reliance on tired tropes ultimately render it a disappointing cinematic experience, appealing primarily to die-hard Kajol fans who are willing to overlook its many shortcomings. The film's ambition to explore complex themes is evident, but its execution lacks the finesse and coherence necessary to bring those themes to fruition. In the end, 'Maa' serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of a well-crafted screenplay and a clear directorial vision in bringing a film's potential to life. The film also touches upon themes of family secrets and their generational impact. Shuvankar's decision to hide the dark history of his family from his daughter Shweta creates a sense of unease and contributes to the overall atmosphere of dread. The weight of the past hangs heavy over the present, and the characters are forced to confront the consequences of their ancestors' actions. This element of intergenerational trauma adds another layer of complexity to the narrative, but it is not explored as fully as it could have been. The film also attempts to explore the dynamics of rural village life and the tensions between tradition and modernity. The villagers are depicted as deeply rooted in their customs and beliefs, and they are wary of outsiders who threaten to disrupt their way of life. This clash of cultures creates conflict and adds to the sense of unease that permeates the film. However, the film's portrayal of rural life is somewhat stereotypical and lacks nuance. The characters are often depicted as one-dimensional and their motivations are not always clear. Despite these shortcomings, 'Maa' does offer some moments of genuine suspense and horror. The use of jump scares is effective in creating a sense of unease, and the visual effects are well-executed. However, these moments are ultimately undermined by the film's incoherent narrative and lack of focus. The film's attempts to blend elements of horror, mythology, and social commentary are ultimately unsuccessful, resulting in a muddled and unsatisfying cinematic experience. The film's failure to deliver on its potential is particularly disappointing given the talent involved. Kajol's performance is a standout, and the supporting cast also delivers solid performances. However, even the best actors cannot save a film with a weak script and a confused direction. The film's co-production by Devgn Films further raises expectations, but these expectations are ultimately unmet. In the end, 'Maa' is a film that is ultimately more frustrating than frightening. It has the potential to be something special, but it falls short due to its lack of focus and incoherent narrative. Only die-hard Kajol fans are likely to find much to enjoy in this film.
The director, Vishal Furia, known for his previous horror ventures like 'Lapachhapi' and its Hindi remake 'Chhori', attempts to bring his expertise to 'Maa'. However, the film deviates from a singular, focused horror narrative, meandering through various themes and subplots that ultimately dilute its impact. The initial setup, with the eerie Bengal village and the unexplained disappearances of young girls, holds promise. The atmosphere of dread is palpable, and the visual elements, such as the ancient banyan tree and the dilapidated zamindar's mansion, contribute to the overall sense of unease. However, as the story unfolds, it becomes increasingly convoluted, with multiple characters and storylines vying for attention. The introduction of the daitya, the demon linked to the tree, adds a supernatural element to the film, but its execution is somewhat clumsy and lacks the necessary scares to truly terrify the audience. The film also suffers from pacing issues, with some scenes feeling rushed while others drag on unnecessarily. The exposition is often clunky, and the dialogue is sometimes unnatural. The characters' motivations are not always clear, and their actions often seem illogical. The film also relies heavily on jump scares, which become predictable and lose their effectiveness over time. The more sophisticated horror films rely on creating a sense of dread and unease that slowly builds throughout the film, creating a lasting impact on the viewer. 'Maa' relies too heavily on cheap thrills, which ultimately undermine its potential to be a truly terrifying film. Furthermore, the film's attempts to address themes of patriarchy and female empowerment feel forced and unconvincing. The film's depiction of the villagers and their customs is also somewhat problematic, with stereotypes often being employed for comedic effect. While the film does make an attempt to portray the strength and resilience of Ambika, the character ultimately falls into the trope of the doting mother who will do anything to protect her child. The film also fails to explore the complexities of the curse and its impact on the village community. The curse is simply presented as a malevolent force that must be overcome, without any real exploration of its origins or its psychological effects on the victims. The film also neglects to delve into the history of the zamindar family and their role in the curse. The film's ending is also unsatisfying, with the resolution feeling rushed and anticlimactic. The final confrontation between Ambika and the daitya is poorly executed, and the film's message about the power of maternal love feels hollow. Overall, 'Maa' is a film that is ultimately disappointing due to its incoherent narrative, lack of focus, and reliance on tired tropes. The film's ambition is evident, but its execution falls short of its potential. The film's strongest asset is Kajol's performance, but even her talent cannot save the film from its fundamental flaws. The film is likely to appeal only to die-hard Kajol fans who are willing to overlook its many shortcomings. For viewers who are looking for a truly terrifying or thought-provoking horror film, 'Maa' is likely to leave them wanting more.
The visual presentation of 'Maa', though, offers some redeeming qualities. The cinematography effectively captures the eerie atmosphere of the Bengali village, with its lush greenery, dilapidated structures, and dimly lit interiors. The use of shadows and light creates a sense of unease, and the visual effects are generally well-executed. The design of the daitya is also quite striking, with its grotesque appearance adding to the film's horror quotient. However, even the strong visual elements cannot compensate for the film's narrative flaws. The film's soundtrack is also somewhat generic, failing to create a truly memorable or unsettling atmosphere. The music is often too loud and overpowering, drowning out the dialogue and detracting from the film's overall impact. The sound design is also inconsistent, with some scenes feeling too quiet while others are excessively loud. The film also suffers from a lack of originality. Many of the horror tropes used in the film have been seen countless times before, and the film fails to bring anything new or innovative to the genre. The film's plot is also derivative, borrowing elements from various other horror films and mythological stories. The film's lack of originality makes it feel somewhat stale and predictable. The film also fails to create a believable world. The characters' actions and dialogue often feel unnatural, and the film's depiction of rural life is somewhat stereotypical. The film's inconsistencies make it difficult to fully immerse oneself in the story. Ultimately, 'Maa' is a film that is more style than substance. While the film has some strong visual elements and a commendable performance from Kajol, its narrative flaws and lack of originality ultimately undermine its potential. The film is likely to appeal only to viewers who are easily entertained by jump scares and are not too demanding in terms of plot or character development. For viewers who are looking for a truly intelligent and thought-provoking horror film, 'Maa' is likely to be a disappointment. The film is a missed opportunity, failing to deliver on its potential and leaving viewers with a sense of unfulfilled expectations. The film is a reminder that even the best actors and visual effects cannot save a film with a weak script and a confused direction. The film is a cautionary tale about the importance of a well-crafted narrative in creating a truly memorable and impactful cinematic experience. Maa ultimately fails to find its footing, flying in multiple directions without establishing a steady orbit, making it a watch only suggested for Kajol fans who can enjoy her performance regardless of the film's shortcomings. The themes, though attempting to be timeless, fail to translate into a compelling gender war drama, rendering it more unhinged than earth-shatteringly terrifying.
Source: Maa Review: Kajol Show All The Way But Film Falls Flat