 |
|
Operation Sindoor, India's response to the Pahalgam terror attack, represents a significant shift in its strategic posture towards Pakistan and the broader South Asian security landscape. The operation, which involved targeted strikes against terror infrastructure within Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), has been framed by India as a demonstration of its strategic sovereignty and a willingness to use calibrated force under the nuclear shadow. This marks a departure from decades of strategic restraint and signals a new era in India's approach to dealing with cross-border terrorism. At its core, Operation Sindoor dismantles the long-held notion that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal provides an impenetrable shield for its support of terrorist activities. By conducting strikes deep within Pakistani territory, including areas near presumed nuclear facilities, India has effectively called Pakistan's nuclear bluff and asserted its ability to retaliate against terrorism without triggering a full-scale nuclear exchange. This recalibration of the deterrence equation is arguably the most consequential outcome of Operation Sindoor. Furthermore, the operation demonstrates India's mastery of escalation control. By carefully selecting targets and calibrating the level of force used, India has sought to avoid escalating the conflict into a broader war. The decision to refrain from strikes in Balochistan and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, regions with existing internal dissent against the Pakistani state, is a crucial aspect of this strategy. This denied Pakistan the opportunity to rally its fractious peripheries and confined the conflict to military and terror-linked targets, minimizing the risk of a wider conflagration. The success of Operation Sindoor is also attributable to India's control of the narrative. Unlike previous instances, such as the Balakot airstrikes, where India's post-strike silence allowed misinformation to proliferate, this time New Delhi proactively shaped the global narrative through the swift release of satellite imagery, transparent briefings, and open debunking of Pakistani propaganda. Prime Minister Modi's visit to Adampur airbase, showcasing the intact S-400 systems, served as a powerful visual symbol of India's resolve and credibility. This effective information warfare campaign ensured that Pakistan's disinformation efforts found little traction on the international stage. The precision targeting methodology employed in Operation Sindoor further underscores India's evolving capabilities. Intelligence-driven targeting of specific residences within terror compounds, resulting in the elimination of key jihadi leaders and their families, demonstrates a commitment to holding individuals accountable for their actions. The use of loitering munitions to strike strategic targets, including the HQ-9 air defense system near Lahore, exposed vulnerabilities in Pakistan's air defenses and highlighted India's technological advancements. India has also signaled its willingness to leverage its geographical advantages, most notably by suspending the Indus Waters Treaty. Given Pakistan's deepening water crisis, this action constitutes a powerful lever of pressure that could have long-term strategic ramifications without necessarily provoking international condemnation. Operation Sindoor represents a multi-domain campaign, integrating military, cyber, informational, and economic elements. The Indian Navy's deployment of warships off Karachi sent a clear message of India's willingness to broaden the theatre of operations. Reports of India restoring access to Baloch voices on social media platforms suggest a deliberate effort to empower indigenous resistance to Islamabad's control. The combination of these elements creates a comprehensive strategy aimed at weakening Pakistan's ability to support terrorism and exert regional influence.
The implications of Operation Sindoor extend far beyond the immediate tactical gains. It signals a doctrinal evolution in India's approach to national security, moving away from a policy of strategic restraint to one of calibrated force projection. This new doctrine is predicated on the understanding that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal cannot be allowed to serve as a shield for its support of terrorism. India is now signaling its willingness to respond to acts of terrorism with precision and at scale, regardless of the perceived nuclear threshold. This shift in policy has profound implications for regional stability. It introduces a new element of uncertainty into the Indo-Pakistani relationship and could potentially lead to a more volatile security environment. However, it also creates an opportunity for Pakistan to re-evaluate its strategic calculus and reconsider its support for terrorist groups. The success of Operation Sindoor hinges on several factors, including India's ability to maintain escalation control, effectively manage the narrative, and sustain international support for its actions. It also requires a commitment to building credible deterrence capabilities, including a robust intelligence apparatus, advanced military technology, and a well-defined escalation ladder. The operation demonstrates the importance of jointness between the three services, with the Navy, Air Force, and Army working in concert to achieve strategic objectives. The cyber and informational domains are also critical components of this new strategy, requiring sophisticated capabilities to counter disinformation and shape perceptions. Ultimately, the effectiveness of Operation Sindoor will be judged by its ability to deter future acts of terrorism and promote long-term stability in the region. It is a bold and calculated move that carries significant risks and potential rewards. India must now carefully manage the consequences of this operation and work to ensure that it contributes to a more peaceful and secure South Asia. Operation Sindoor isn't merely a military victory; it embodies a formal entry into the global arena where calibrated military force serves as a standard policy instrument for achieving national objectives. What's revolutionary is not just the action itself, but the doctrine it now signifies.
Dr. Walter Ladwig's analysis for RUSI notes that Operation Sindoor introduces a fresh perspective to India's strategic toolkit: calibrated force under the nuclear shadow. Jyotishman Bhagawati, writing in Asia Times, adds that by targeting presumed nuclear infrastructure, including Kirana Hills and Noor Khan Airbase, India called Islamabad's bluff. This break from the traditional Indo-Pakistani cycle of attack, international outcry, and de-escalation marks a crucial turning point. India conducted multi-day strikes, absorbed Pakistani retaliation, and ultimately dictated the terms and timing of the ceasefire. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar emphasized that this outcome was achieved through direct communication initiated by Pakistan, signaling India's credibility, resolve, and strategic maturity—the cornerstones of sustainable deterrence. Operation Sindoor is not an isolated incident but a doctrinal evolution deeply embedded in India's response framework. The new threshold is clear: any future terror attack will trigger a precise and scalable Indian retaliation. Potential adversaries, both state and non-state actors, will now factor in this heightened risk of systematic and scalable retaliation. India's success in the age of disinformation, as demonstrated by Operation Sindoor, underscores its mastery of information warfare. By swiftly releasing satellite imagery, conducting transparent briefings, and openly debunking Pakistani propaganda—such as the false claim of the Adampur airbase destruction—India effectively controlled the perception battlefield. In a particularly assertive move, India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, a pact that had endured wars and crises since 1960. Pakistan's deepening water crisis amplifies the impact of this decision, transforming it from a symbolic gesture into a potentially destabilizing factor without eliciting widespread international condemnation. Through this single action, India weaponized geography, adding hydro-diplomacy to its arsenal of pressure tools. India's message is not solely about retaliation; it's about sustaining pressure across the spectrum. The military showcased unprecedented jointness, with Navy warships patrolling off Karachi to signal a broader willingness to engage. Vice Admiral AN Pramod stated that the Navy ensured Pakistan's air force remained "bottled up" on the Makran coast. Furthermore, India reportedly restored access to Baloch voices on social platforms, quietly supporting indigenous resistance against Islamabad's control, and avoided exacerbating Pakistani nationalism by refraining from bombing Balochistan or Khyber Pakhtunkhwa while capitalizing on internal divisions. By placing the Indus Waters Treaty in "abeyance," India introduced a potent new pressure lever, potentially triggering long-term strategic consequences for Pakistan without incurring international backlash. Operation Sindoor, therefore, is a watershed moment, redefining the strategic landscape of South Asia and cementing India's position as a regional power willing to use its full range of capabilities to protect its interests and deter future aggression. The message to Pakistan, and indeed to the world, is clear: India's era of strategic restraint is over.
Source: Crossing the Rubicon: Why Op Sindoor is a turning point - and Pakistan has no playbook left